My take on the Casey Anthony Trial Frenzi

58

By kd4rvb

Was Justice Served In Orlando?

Today, July 5th, 2011, the world watched as Casey Anthony was found innocent of all felony charges against her. She was, however, found guilty of several misdemeanor charges for her obvious lies to the police during the investigation.

So was justice served in the end of the media frenzy that was the Casey Anthony Trial? Generally, and while I will reserve my own judgment in the spirit of an unbiased and objective opinion, justice was served. Many obviously disagree with the verdict. Many I am finding agree as well. The real question is was the trial a fair trial?

Reasonable Doubt Prevails Again

As I watched the prosecution apply their case against Casey Anthony with a truly massive volume of circumstantial evidence. They were excellent and skillful in the execution of their trade and surely stood out against an inexperienced defense team who in spite of the evidence had nothing to prove.

You see, in the United States a citizen is never guilty until it can be proven that a crime had been committed by them beyond all reasonable doubt. Many of us remember watching the OJ Simpson trial so many years ago. Again he was tried and convicted by the public long before his case came to trial. For those who are to young to know and those who may have forgotten, OJ Simpson was charged with the grisly murder of his ex-wife and her boyfriend at the time.

The OJ Simpson and Casey Anthony trials have so much in common. These were high profile cases based upon strong circumstantial evidence that in the end left enough reasonable doubt that, in spite of obvious mental issues with both of the accused, they were found innocent due to the reasonable doubt that could not be overcome by vast amounts of evidence.

Was Casey Anthony Tried By the Public? Guilty Until Proven Innocent?

The verdict was shocking at the end of this trial. However, I believe the shock was more due to the amount of media hype presented to the public over a three year period of time where we we shown over and over the bizarre and crazy antics of Casey Anthony after the estimated time of her daughters death.

Casey's actions were beyond the imagination of what the majority of our society considers normal. Proven lies, imaginary friends, parties, boyfriends, hiding and doubt allowed many to come to the conclusion that she was guilty. She was tried and convicted by the public based upon a complete lack of real evidence, by media opinions, by a need to blame somebody for the death of a sweet little girl.

Will There Ever Be Justice For Caylee's Killer?

Will there ever be justice for Caylee Anthony's death? Of course there will. Whether or not Casey Anthony killed her, justice will be served when her murderer is judged by our Lord God. For those of you who don't believe in God I have no answer for you but this is my personal belief. The one bias I will allow to enter this article. The one reasonable solution that brings me peace and closure to the loss of a human being before she even had a chance to live.

What lesson can we learn from her loss? How can we find some sense of value to latch on to now that the trial is over? We, as a people, as a world, have had a rare opportunity to view that which makes our country what it is. That the law can prevail over mob madness. While we haven't had riots in the streets we have allowed our fascination to stop the world for nearly six weeks and for what? What has been accomplished?

What has truly changed because of this? What of all of the other children who have been murdered and abused? Will this be the result for each and every one? Hardly, this is just one case. A single example of an event that occurs on almost a daily basis somewhere in the country. Sometimes justice is served, sometimes the innocent are accused and found guilty. I choose to believe that for the most part our system of justice prevails and I will continue to have faith that our society does what is best to protect all of its citizens.

Comments

dashingclaire profile image

dashingclaire Level 2 Commenter 10 months ago

Although there was a lot of emotion in the case in a child’s death, did the prosecutors make their case? The defense did not have to prove anything. The burden of proof was on the persecutors to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Doubt covered the case when there was no actual cause of death given by the medical examiner. There was no proof that Caylee did not drown. That was reasonable doubt. Casey could not be placed at the scene of the crime, because no crime scene was found. All the defense needed was to put a doubt in the prosecutors case to win. Cindy Anthony, the mother, changing her story regarding the computer search for the chloroform, and the time she was at work produced reasonable doubt.

Personally, I believe the entire family was involved in this case. Casey Anthony never spoke about the case with anyone – except her lawyers and perhaps her family. There was no jail house slip of the tongue. Why? May be she had her family’s support. Of course the family was the unusual suspects. I recalled Cliff Keenan, former head of the Superior Court division of the U.S. Attorney's Office, recalling a lesson he gives to law students: "If a police officer hears a shot inside a room and goes in and sees a dead body on the floor and a smoking gun on the table and three persons pointing a finger at each other and not saying a word, the police officer would likely be able to articulate probable cause and arrest all three."

In court, though, without additional evidence, the case would founder, Keenan says: "In my hypothetical, you'd never be able to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It's a case that may actually result in someone getting away with murder."

The State of Florida made a mistake charging both 1st degree murder and manslaughter. They should have charged one or the other. Now there’s Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal. Cold cases have a way of becoming warm/or years later. A 71 year old was recently charged in a murder case from 1957. Double jeopardy is a procedural defense that forbids a defendant from being tried again on the same, or similar charges following a legitimate acquittal

kd4rvb profile image

kd4rvb Hub Author 10 months ago

You make some very well thought out and excellent points dashingclaire, I thank you for your comments.

VioletSun profile image

VioletSun Level 5 Commenter 10 months ago

I agree with your words: "That the law can prevail over mob madness". I find it comforting that inspite of public opinion, justice was done because they could not find her guilty without a reasonable doubt. No one gets away with anything as you also mentioned . What goes around comes around if not here then we leave this physical world. Guess, I am agreeing with you because you voiced my thoughts of today when I heard she was found innocent.

Welcome to Hubpages, hope you enjoy your stay!

Voted up!

ImYoungAtHeart profile image

ImYoungAtHeart 10 months ago

Reasonable doubt maybe in the jurors minds because I don't think the full truth will ever come out. I have a hard time with crimes that involve young children. I know accidents can happen but parents/family would not be hiding so much if it was an accident. I hope the truth comes out some day.

Nice article btw :)

Sharyn's Slant profile image

Sharyn's Slant Level 7 Commenter 10 months ago

I have been watching this case for the past three years and the end result did make me sick. If only so much time did not go by . . . maybe we'd have the answers. I am still working on accepting that "justice WAS served." I get it and I understand your thoughts. It just is hard to accept. I do believe in what goes around, comes around - good and bad. Thanks for calming me a little more about this case.

Sharyn

kd4rvb profile image

kd4rvb Hub Author 10 months ago

While I tried to be unbiased in my hub, I generally feel the same as you and many others. I watched most every moment and was quite shocked at the turnout. It is sad that we will never really know what happened since the only one who does is the best liar in the universe and could never be trusted to give a truthful accounting. Still as I discuss in my hub, it is still understandable, even if just barely, how this outcome has turned out. Thank you very much for your comment and I am glad it helped.

DeborahFantasia profile image

DeborahFantasia 10 months ago

Great Hub, objective and informative ! So many people are either one way or the other on the whole situation. I think that the prosecution (state) should learn that they shouldn't charge someone with a crime unless they have the evidence to prove it in court. Prosecutors can charge anybody with anything and these people can end up in jail for years waiting for trial.

Midnyte13 10 months ago

Yes, I know that the jury felt they had reasonable doubt, but it's hard to hear their interviews where they say they let a killer go. I can only keep telling myself, "Justice will prevail in the end." How anyone could harm a child, and especially their own child, is beyond my comprehension. No child deserves to be beaten, starved, or abused in any way. It's so sad that barely a day passes that the news doesn't speak of a child being abused.

Submit a Comment
Members and Guests

Sign in or sign up and post using a hubpages account.



    • No HTML is allowed in comments, but URLs will be hyperlinked
    • Comments are not for promoting your Hubs or other sites

    Please wait working